Tuesday 5 April 2011

Evaluation Question 3: Audience Feedback


We conducted a focus group with an audience of 17-18 year olds and one adult.




From our results we found:


  • The audience thought the narrative was similar to Romeo and Juliett, in the way they both died.

  • They could relate it to the beginning of a horror film as it used flashbacks to reminis on the past.

  • The soundtrack was emotive and suited it's purpose.

  • The film could be understood without the voice over, this shows our narrative was strong.

  • They understood the importance of the tree and liked how it linked to the character's past.

  • It could have been the start of a feature length film, if someone had saved him from dying and a new relationship could have formed, and 'bloomed like a tree'.

  • The soundtrack makes you sympathise with the man.

  • The article proved more effective at advertising the film to this audience than the posters, mainly because the large image on it was more interesting than the ones of the trees on the posters.

  • Overall, they enjoyed the film.

After receiving this audience feedback we decided that maybe our film is aimed at a more older audience, as the adult of the group seemed to understand the concept better. After attending a lecture with Roy Stafford and learning about independant films such as, 'Winter's Bone', 'Submarine' and 'Norweigen Wood' I believe our film could fit into the genre of independant films, shown at art houses with an older, middle class audience; partly because of the issues raised in the film, but also because of the unusual camera work and the use of handheld shots for effect. The 17-18 year olds didn't seem to be as enticed by the film as the adult, and their feedback showed they didn't understand the concept as much as we would have liked.


Audience research was collected all the way through our project. We had feedback for the font of our posters, therefore changed them. Also, a main point is the audience feedback from our first film idea which forced us to change our idea, which turned out for the best as the audience responded better to the new idea. As producers we were making our film for the audience, not for ourselves.

No comments:

Post a Comment